College Kid’s Junk is a Charity’s Treasure
by Mark Price
for the Charlotte Observer
May 20, 2016
College students are notoriously untidy and no one appreciates it more than charities.
That’s because the stuff abandoned by departing students this time of year is a treasure trove of usable goods for thrift stores and low-income housing programs.
As a result, the Salvation Army, Goodwill Industries and Crisis Assistance Ministry have forged partnerships with local institutions like UNC Charlotte, Davidson College and Queens University of Charlotte.
Students pile up what they can’t carry or ship home for summer break, and charity trucks happily haul it away, including TVs, furniture, computers, clothes, small appliances and countless futons. Students benefit, because most colleges have policies that fine students who don’t remove everything from their dorm rooms.
In the case of Goodwill and the Salvation Army, the items are used to stock thrift stores that fund a variety of charity programs, including job skills training. At Crisis Assistance Ministry, the benefit is even more direct, with the items going to a Furniture Bank and free store that supply goods at no charge to low-income people and families moving from homelessness into housing programs.
Goodwill officials said they received donations this year from Winthrop University in Rock Hill and Johnson & Wales University. The agency says the period following college gradations is the second busiest of the year for donations, followed by the final week of December when donors try to beat the Dec. 31 deadline for tax deductions.
Tovi Martin of Crisis Assistance said this year that agency received furniture from Davidson College and mattresses from both Davidson and UNC Charlotte. Past donors, she said, have included Johnson & Wales, Queens University of Charlotte, and Johnson C. Smith University.
Last year, 1,601 families (including 2,029 children) received furniture, beds, or essential appliances from the Crisis Assistance Free Furniture Bank, she said. Recipients are referred by charities and social services programs.
Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/article78878667.html#storylink=cpy
Optimistic Futurist Writing Guidelines and Style Sheet
There are two ways to submit an article for the Optimistic Futurist:
- Using a lead provided by the Optimistic Futurist
- Using a lead you found. If you elect this option, prior to writing an article, the writer must submit a paragraph that describes the thrust and direction of the article for approval by Dr. Francis Koster. Absent this guidance, well intentioned writers can create very interesting articles which do not have the focus we had in mind, rework is required, and irritation abounds.
Article should clearly state the issue being addressed as well as how the local solution was successfully implemented. The article should be presented as follows:
- Please use Microsoft Word when you transmit the article to us.
- All articles should be between 750 and 1,100 words.
- The article should use Arial font, size 10, and Single line spacing
- Headlines are to be Arial font, size 12, and no more than 20 words. Capitalize the first letter in every word of the headline. Center headline at the top of the page.
- Please use 2 spaces after punctuation
- Also required is a “Crawl,” not to exceed 55 characters (including spaces). The Crawl should contain a simple declarative statement about the project’s success (for example: Inner-city hospital reduces caesarean births 11 percent!). Capitalize the first letter of the first word of the crawl
- The articles should be written at the 10th grade reading level or lower, according to the Microsoft Office Word evaluation tool.
- Any fact stated must be documented using endnotes (not footnotes) as to a reliable source – not Wikipedia.
- Embedded images and video usage is encouraged. Any image or video must be used in accordance to licensing permission requirements (see also #7, “legal to use,” below).
- Avoid using a headline or crawl already appearing on the site.
- The end of the article should list research sources and helpful links related to the article.
- Writers may elect to have their name associated with the piece, or not.
- We have a standard file naming protocol that should be used (remember, you cannot use punctuation in a file name - but you can use underscore):
- TheOptimisticFuturist_(name of lead)_(date of latest draft)_(last name of author)_(time of day of latest draft)
- Example would be: TheOptimisticFuturist_Innovative Haircuts_May 23 2011_Koster_2 pm
Once submitted, Dr. Koster will proofread the article for language, grammar and content.
Writers meeting the criteria below, and who have submitted and received approval on the paragraph mentioned above, will be paid $50 by check upon posting of the article. Posting takes about three days. Articles accepted for publication but not posted will result in a $25.00 “kill fee.” No article will be published unless it:
- Contains a clear goal statement of the project being described;
- Cites documentable metrics showing progress toward the stated goal of the project being featured;
- Details whether a project is ongoing. (We will publish reports of a project which succeeded and then ceased operations.);
- Describes major challenges overcome;
- Shows a positive cash flow after start up (volunteer labor must be assigned a free market comparable value in these calculations);
- Demonstrates that the project can be replicable elsewhere; and
- Is accompanied at a minimum a “legal to use” still photograph, although short “legal to use” videos are preferred.
Francis P. Koster, Ed.D.
Fran received his doctorate from The Program for the Study of The Future at the University of Massachusetts where his dissertation work focused on why populations and leaders would ignore warnings, even when the warning was factual, had reliable sources, and was delivered directly to the people who could and should take evasive action.
Fran is a writer and frequent lecturer on threats to our basic life support systems of air, water, food, and energy. His lectures and articles offer proven, cost-effective, and job creating solutions to those problems. His research, coupled with extensive careers with progressive responsibility in Higher Education Administration, Peace Corps, Renewable Energy, and Healthcare, convinced him that it does no good to warn people about emerging problems or opportunities if you cannot also furnish them with an acceptable alternative path.
"Telling leaders that the sky is going to fall only makes them feel impotent, discouraged, and resistant," says Fran, "unless you can also hand them an umbrella and a map to safe shelter. If a problem is pointed out without furnishing a solution, the recipient of the warning reacts psychologically by blocking the warning. This means leaders cannot hear, and thus cannot lead in positive directions."
Guidelines for Article Topics
The program need not be in existence, but when it was, it must have been documented to have worked. Make sure you explain your criteria for success (number of pounds collected, kids who can read, gallons saved, etc.), and the cost benefit.
No limit on words, but we note that readers tend to focus more on those that are about a single 8 ½ x 11 page or page and a half in length.
Given that reading is becoming a lost art, your program will attract many more viewers if you can spice it up with one or two photos or charts, etc, and a YouTube video.
All assertions of fact must be footnoted. Same for quotes, awards, praise, etc.
If the good news is taken from an internal document (submission to your board of directors, etc) and not already public, give us a contact phone number so we can discuss the source document.
Nominations can have been from the Public, the "for-profit" or the "not-for-profit" sector. When such efforts were grant funded, or heavily supported by volunteers, we will attempt to report the value of such subsidy to determine if the output is worth the input. In many cases some form of subsidy has been used to explore an innovation, and/or underwritten proof of concept, but when the subsidy stops the good idea vanishes from view. We want to harvest that hard work and make it available for others to build on. We will publicize subsidized successes, but will attempt to be clear about the subsidy.
We do not publish information on new ideas, untested concepts, or visions without a successful track record, no matter how exciting they may seem. We will, however, publish information on efforts that succeeded, and then ended. We limit the content of this website to programs which function in the United States because of our unique laws, culture, tax code, and social structure.
After review by our team to verify that it meets our criteria, the summary will be posted.
Make sure you include the subject organizations name, address, contact number, and website if any.